Friday 8 September 2023

Experience of the 2022 tax audits

 

As it is well known, one of the main tasks of the Hungarian Tax Authority is to ensure budget revenues by collecting taxes and other public charges. The success of this is also linked to the fact that taxpayers are not entirely voluntary and autonomous in meeting their tax obligations, but they are aware of their controllability. This possibility provides a powerful incentive to comply.





It is easy to see, however, that audits can only be truly effective if they reach primarily those who are most likely to have a need to hide. The tax authority does not impose an unnecessary burden on those who are fundamentally honest and diligent in their tax duties. This approach, i.e. action proportionate to compliance with the law, is what the tax authority represent. But it's also worth looking behind the principles, so in addition to this year's audit trends, we also report on previous experiences.

 

The authority therefore tries to treat all taxpayers as they "deserve" to be treated: to help compliant taxpayers to become more efficient, to help those who make mistakes or errors to interpret the rules correctly, to control those who pose a risk and to punish fraudsters. The basis for this and for targeted selection is the risk analysis, which is based on the collection of online, real-time, transaction-based and internationally collaborative data that has become increasingly common in recent years. These are analysed by the in-process built automation systems on one side, and by the colleagues of the tax authority on the other side, if it is needed. Based on the results, taxpayers are asked for self-revisions, contacted or selected for self-audits.

The effectiveness of this procedure can be perhaps demonstrated by the drastic reduction in the VAT gap (the difference between estimated and actual VAT collected) compared to previous years. Unsurprisingly, one of the most effective areas of audits has been precisely the investigation of discrepancies between the real time reporting system and the VAT returns. The number of tax audits was also very high, but the resulting tax difference were also very high: 11,000 inspections determined a tax difference in the amount of 54.3 billion.

 

Another area of success, according to the audit indicators, was the detection of employment-related irregularities: almost 1600 audits revealed a tax difference in the amount of 3.6 billion. From the point of view of efficiency, the issue of the settlement of employee relations must be highlighted, with an almost 50% efficiency rate. Last year, tax auditors have checked about 94,000 legal relations in about 7,300 companies and settled more than 46,000 legal relations.

Although there were fears that last year's personal income tax refund would attract fraudsters, fortunately this did not happen.

Nevertheless, out of 25,000 audits, 4.5 billion of tax deficit on personal income tax was detected.

In order to identify the reasons for the discrepancies in employment relationship notifications and in the payment of contributions, the authority has carried out a large number of support procedures: Out of 1000 procedures, 600 were successful, however often only the missing deregistration formulars caused administrative errors. In this area, a difference of 317 million HUF in contributions was detected.

Last year, 628 audits were carried out among the largest, or priority taxpayers, and more than HUF 2.7 billion in tax deficit were detected.


It is also worth noting that international data exchanges also supplies data to the Member States, which are also entered into the tax authority’s information database. Although some of these are of varying quality, sometimes they are not fully reliable, authorities are paying increasing attention to these external control data.

In 2022, investigations could only be carried out based on data received from 2018, but even this way, 1600 out of more than 2800 procedures were successful and discrepancies of around 300 million HUF were detected.

 

However, regional tax authorities make much more effective use of this data because they know their taxpayers better, as demonstrated by the studies carried out in the framework of the DAC6 information exchange. This means that if a taxpayer sets up a company structure with the involvement of an adviser that could be used for tax avoidance, the adviser must report it.

In this area, 30 procedures - still considered to be supplementary investigations - revealed a tax difference of HUF 235 billion, which represented a tax increase of HUF 260 million. They are selected for this test based on transaction value, operation in a low-tax country, affiliation status and prominent operational data such as loss-making.

Finally, interesting lessons can be drawn from transfer pricing audits, where tax authority investigations can even reveal sector-specific results. One of the areas highlighted in 2022 was the automotive sector, where a significant tax gap has been identified, which could be due to trivial errors such as missing or not updated transfer pricing documentation.

It may be a content error if they define the "character" of their company incorrectly: e.g. they are not a full-risk producer while they classify themselves as such. It may be that the wrong benchmark is chosen in the valuation of the transaction, or the data may be wrong, or the profitability range may not be properly defined. Based on last years’ experience, even more in-depth checks are expected this year, so everyone should review their documentation now and update it if necessary.


At the same time, it is undeniable that in transfer pricing, a well-reasoned counterargument to the authorities' objections may be justified, but this can only be done based on real, well-interpreted data. After all, it is the only way to avoid the tax assessments!